Monday 4 April 2016

Limitless with Assistive Technology


       Teachers need to understand that everyone has a different way of learning and that no two students are exactly alike. When a teacher creates a lesson plan, they need to know the demographics of each student and find a way to meet each student’s needs. In order for specific needs to be met, the teacher may need to add some accommodations, or modifications to the lesson plan. According to Texas Project First’s “Accommodations Vs. Modifications” chart, there is a distinct difference between the two. Instructional Accommodation and Instructional Modification both change how the content is taught, made accessible, and/or assessed. The main difference between the two is that “Accommodations do not change what the student is to master. The objectives of the course activity remain intact. Modifications do change what the student is expected to master. Course activity/objectives are modified to meet the needs of the learner” (n.d.).
       Edutopia’s 10 minute video titled “Assistive Technology: Enabling Dreams,” (2005) featured a variety of assistive technology tools and instruments to demonstrate how important and how much of a difference they make in the lives of individuals with disabilities. The video showed how motorized wheel chairs helped students get around, how a technologically modified instrument helped another student play in his school band, and how speech communication devices helped non-verbal students communicate with their teachers and families. It was truly amazing to see how these tools helped these individuals to do so much and live independent and fulfilling lives despite their disabilities.
       During one of my observations at a local high school, I was able to shadow a deaf-blind student and their paraprofessional educator for one full school day. This student used a number of assistive technologies to enhance their mobility and educational experience at school. The school provided hearing aides and a small microphone along with a small speaker so the student could hear lessons and have conversations with other people. The special education resource room provided a walking stick for the student so they could walk around the classroom independently. The class also had a braille typewriter so the student could complete written assignments. The student was very bright and was able to complete assignments in the recourse room because of these assistive technologies.
        The deaf-blind student had some classes in the general education classrooms, but the classes did not provide the same assistive technologies so it was difficult for the student to participate in class activities and complete work independently. In one of the student’s general education classes, the teacher did not modify their lesson to meet the student’s needs. According to the paraprofessional educator, the teacher would regularly write notes on the whiteboard for the students to copy in their notebooks. After the students copied their notes, the students would receive a short worksheet related to the notes and they were to complete it during the class period. Since the student was blind, and the teacher did not add any accommodations for this particular student in their lesson, there was no way for the student to complete the assignment independently. The student’s paraprofessional educator had to write the notes for the student. While the paraprofessional was writing the notes the student was left out and did not have anything to do. After the paraprofessional copied the notes for their student, they would read the notes aloud for the student. The paraprofessional would also read the questions on the short worksheet aloud for the student and write the student’s answers down.
      As a future special education teacher I was very disappointed with what I observed. The same student who was able to walk around the class and do independent work during the previous class period was now excluded from the rest of the class and was left fully dependent on their paraprofessional educator because this general education classroom did not have the tools the student needed and the teacher did not adjust their lesson plan to accommodate the students needs. As a special education teacher I would have used the student’s Individualized Education Program as a way to revise my lessons and to evaluate the appropriateness of the revised activities. According to Stanberry’s article titled “Understanding Individualized Education Programs,” she stated that, “If your child receives special education services, he must have an Individualized Education Program (IEP). That’s the law. An IEP is an important legal document. It spells out your child’s needs, the services the school will provide, and how progress should be measured” (n.d.).
       I feel that the general education teacher could have made some minor adjustments to their lesson that would have made a major difference to this student’s learning experience in their classroom. The teacher could have delivered the notes and the worksheet to the student orally, or provide them in braille. Also instead of having the paraprofessional copy the notes for the student, the teacher could have requested that the student bring their braille typewriter from the resource room to their classroom so the student could write their own notes. I believe that students with special needs can accomplish so much more than what others give them credit for; they just need to be given the opportunity to show us what they can do and they need the proper tools to accomplish these feats.
Me at age 3 with my brother at age 2.
        Another personal experience I had with someone who used assistive technology was with my brother, who was born with clubbed feet. According to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, “clubfoot is a deformity in which an infant’s foot is turned inward, often so severely that the bottom of the foot faces sideways, or even upward.” My brother was considered physically disabled from birth until he was about 3 or 4 years old when he completed treatment and physical therapy. My brother went through three different methods to correct the position of his feet, which included multiple surgeries on each foot, wearing casts, and using solid bar braces. The casts and solid bar braces are considered assistive technologies because it helped in the process of straightening out my brother’s feet to improve in his functional capabilities.       
My brothers, cousin, and I after a soccer game.
       I completely forgot that my brother had a disability until this assignment. I think the fact that that my brother was born with a disability slipped my mind because my parents did not treat him any differently from the way they treated my other brothers and I. Yes, he may have only been considered physically disabled until he was about 4 years old, but I believe that by seeing beyond a person’s disability and seeing who they really are and who they can become makes a huge difference in the way we treat individuals with disabilities
My brother, left center, along with his teammates celebrating their win after a local competition.
       With the help of the assistive technology, my brother is now able to walk, run, and be physically independent. When we were in elementary school, he was able to play on the soccer team with me. After the soccer season ended my brother wanted to try a martial arts, so my parents enrolled him in Taekwondo. My brother became very dedicated to the sport that he made first-degree black belt by the time he was a sophomore in high school. He also represented Guam in the 4th Oceania Taekwondo Championships in 2010 and came home with a silver medal. When my brother started high school, he was enrolled in the Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps (JROTC) program. Since he was in the class, he decided to tryout for the school’s armed drill team. During all four years on high school, he was able to compete in the local JROTC competitions and his school won each year. Each year my brother’s JROTC team went on to compete in the Golden Bear National Drill Competition in California and they would bring home trophies each time. By his senior year in high school, my brother made Cadet Colonel, which is the highest rank a student can get in high school.  He also became the Battalion Commander for the school’s JROTC program. Right before he graduated from high school, my brother was awarded with a full scholarship to the University of Guam under the university’s ROTC program.
       I did not share my experience with my brother and all his accomplishments to boast about him, because who wants to openly admit that their sibling is cooler than them, but to show that with the proper support from families and the community, and the help of assistive technologies no matter how simple, or high tech they may be, individuals with disabilities can reach their full potential and can essentially be limitless. As a future teacher in the special education department, I will certainly do my best to ensure that each student’s needs are met and to see beyond their disabilities to help them have a full and meaningful life.
My family together with my brother after he was awarded with a full scholarship to the University of Guam.




Resources:
 

American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Clubfoot. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2016, from http://orthoinfo.aaos.org/topic.cfm?topic=a00255

Ken, E. (Director). (2005). Edutopia. Assistive Technology: Enabling Dreams [Video File]. United States. Retrieved April 4, 2016, from http://www.edutopia.org/assistive-technology-enabling-dreams-video

Stanberry, K. (n.d.).  Understood. Understanding Individualized Education Programs. Retrieved April 4, 2016, from https://www.understood.org/en/school-learning/special-services/ieps/understanding-individualized-education-programs

Texas Project First. Accommodations VS. Modifications. (n.d.). Retrieved April 4, 2016, from http://www.texasprojectfirst.org/ModificationAccommodation.html



1 comment: